20 Crucial Mercantilism Pros and Cons

Mercantilism was the dominant economic theory and practice in Europe from the 16th to the 18th century, a period marked by the rise of nation-states, significant exploration, and the expansion of colonial empires. At its core, mercantilism emphasized the accumulation of wealth, primarily through the acquisition of gold and silver, and the establishment and maintenance of a positive balance of trade. This article delves into the principles and policies of mercantilism, its impact on European economies and societies, the critiques that led to its decline, and its lasting legacy.

Pros of Mercantilism

  1. Economic Growth: Mercantilism contributed to increased domestic production and trade by promoting exports and discouraging imports. This led to the expansion of European trade and commerce, fostering growth in various industries. The accumulation of wealth through gold and silver also helped to bolster economic growth, as it provided resources for investment in infrastructure and new technologies.
  2. National Wealth: By focusing on the accumulation of gold and silver, mercantilism aimed to strengthen national economies and enhance political power. This belief in the interconnectedness of national wealth and power led to economic considerations becoming central to the formulation of foreign policy, further reinforcing the connection between wealth and political influence.
  3. Self-sufficiency: Mercantilist policies promoted domestic production and aimed to reduce reliance on foreign goods. By encouraging self-sufficiency, nations were able to maintain greater control over their economies and resources, reducing vulnerability to external shocks and fostering independence.
  4. Colonial Expansion: Mercantilism motivated European powers to expand their empires, securing resources and markets for their domestic industries. This pursuit of colonial expansion resulted in the establishment of global trade networks and the spread of European culture, contributing to the rise of European powers on the world stage.
  5. Technological Advancements: The focus on domestic production and international trade spurred technological innovations and advancements in manufacturing. Improvements in transportation, communication, and production methods allowed for more efficient trade and economic growth, further reinforcing the benefits of mercantilist policies.
  6. Urbanization: The growth of industries and trade under mercantilism led to the development of urban centers, transforming societies and economies. Urbanization facilitated the exchange of ideas, goods, and services, contributing to increased productivity and economic development.
  7. State Intervention: Mercantilism advocated for active government involvement in the economy, enabling the state to guide economic development and protect national interests. This involvement included providing subsidies and other incentives to support domestic industries, as well as regulating trade and commerce to serve national interests.
  8. Protected Industries: Protectionist policies shielded domestic industries from foreign competition, allowing them to grow and prosper. By imposing tariffs and trade barriers, governments were able to support domestic production and maintain a favorable balance of trade, ultimately contributing to overall economic development.
  9. Economic Development: The pursuit of trade surpluses under mercantilism contributed to overall economic development and the improvement of living standards. Increased wealth and resources allowed for investment in infrastructure, education, and other public goods, further enhancing the prosperity of European societies.
  10. Political Influence: The economic strength derived from mercantilist policies translated into increased political power and influence for European nations on the global stage. By accumulating wealth and resources, European powers were able to assert their dominance in international relations and shape the development of the modern world.
See also  Pros and Cons of Grant Funded Positions

Cons of Mercantilism

  1. Inefficiency: Mercantilism’s protectionist policies and government-backed monopolies often resulted in inefficient resource allocation and production processes. By shielding domestic industries from foreign competition, innovation and productivity were stifled, hindering overall economic growth. Additionally, these policies often led to higher prices for consumers and reduced access to a wider variety of goods, as import restrictions limited the availability of foreign products.
  2. Trade Wars: The focus on maintaining a positive balance of trade and promoting exports at the expense of imports created tensions between European nations. As countries competed for resources, markets, and trade surpluses, trade disputes escalated into full-blown trade wars, which disrupted international commerce and strained diplomatic relations.
  3. Colonial Exploitation: The expansion of colonial empires to secure resources and markets led to the exploitation of indigenous populations and their resources. European powers forcibly extracted wealth from their colonies, often through brutal methods, causing significant social and economic harm to the colonized regions and leading to long-lasting consequences.
  4. Limited Wealth Measures: Mercantilism’s narrow focus on gold and silver as the primary measures of wealth neglected the importance of other valuable resources and economic indicators, such as productivity, living standards, and human capital. This overemphasis on precious metals distorted economic policies and decision-making.
  5. Social Disruption: The rise of powerful merchant and business classes under mercantilism disrupted traditional social structures and hierarchies. As these new classes accumulated wealth and influence, tensions and inequalities emerged within societies, leading to social unrest and political instability.
  6. Restricted Trade: Mercantilist policies limited international trade by imposing tariffs, quotas, and other barriers to protect domestic industries. This approach hampered global economic cooperation and prevented countries from benefiting from the comparative advantages of other nations, ultimately reducing the potential for global economic growth.
  7. Imperialist Attitudes: The pursuit of wealth through colonial expansion fostered imperialist attitudes among European powers. This mindset led to conflicts over territory and resources, as well as negative consequences for colonized regions, such as cultural suppression, resource depletion, and long-lasting political and social upheaval.
  8. Exclusionary Policies: Mercantilist policies often favored certain industries or social groups, creating unequal opportunities and stifling competition. By providing subsidies and other incentives to select sectors, the government effectively picked winners and losers, leading to inefficiencies and perpetuating social divisions.
  9. Overemphasis on Exports: The focus on exports and trade surpluses led to an imbalance in production, with domestic industries geared primarily toward serving foreign markets. This approach neglected the importance of domestic consumption and economic diversification, making economies more vulnerable to external shocks and fluctuations in global demand.
  10. Resistance to Change: Mercantilism’s rigidity and resistance to new ideas and economic systems hindered its ability to adapt to changing global economic conditions. The reluctance to embrace alternative economic theories and practices, such as free trade and laissez-faire principles, contributed to the eventual decline of mercantilism as the dominant economic paradigm in Europe.

Principles and Policies of Mercantilism

The foundation of mercantilism lies in the belief that national wealth and power are interconnected. Economic strength was necessary to support military prowess and political influence, with the accumulation of gold and silver serving as a measure of a nation’s wealth. Consequently, economic considerations were crucial in shaping foreign policy.

See also  Extended Insurance Sweep Deposit Account vs Cash Balance Program

Mercantilist policies aimed to achieve a favorable balance of trade by encouraging exports and discouraging imports. The pursuit of trade surpluses was central to this strategy, with a focus on producing goods that had high export value and low import value. Protectionism was a key element of mercantilism, using tariffs and trade barriers to shield domestic industries from foreign competition. Governments promoted domestic production and self-sufficiency while imposing restrictions on foreign competition through monopolies and regulations.

Colonization and imperialism were also essential aspects of mercantilism. European powers expanded their empires to secure resources and markets, exploiting colonial territories and peoples for economic gain. Mercantilist policies were subsequently implemented within colonial administrations. Furthermore, mercantilism called for active government intervention in the economy to promote growth and development, supporting domestic industries through subsidies and other incentives, and regulating trade and commerce to serve national interests.

Impact of Mercantilism on European Economies and Societies

Mercantilism contributed to the expansion of European trade and commerce during its heyday, fostering the growth of industries and urban centers. This era also saw significant technological innovations and advancements. On the social and political front, the rise of powerful merchant and business classes disrupted traditional structures, while the state’s increased control over economic affairs sparked tensions.

In the realm of international relations, mercantilism intensified European rivalries and competition for resources and markets, leading to trade wars and military conflicts. The influence of mercantilist principles also extended to diplomacy and alliance formation.

Critique and Decline of Mercantilism

Critics of mercantilism pointed to the inefficiencies and distortions caused by protectionist policies and the overemphasis on gold and silver as the sole measures of wealth. They also highlighted the limitations of an export-oriented economic strategy. Political and social critiques centered on opposition to state intervention in economic affairs, concerns about the concentration of wealth and power among privileged groups, and objections to the exploitation of colonial peoples and resources.

The decline of mercantilism was marked by the rise of classical economics and laissez-faire principles, which advocated for free trade and open markets. The influence of Enlightenment ideas on economic thought further contributed to the shift away from mercantilist policies.

Legacy of Mercantilism

Despite its decline, mercantilism continues to influence modern economic thought and policy. Debates over the role of the state in the economy and the persistence of protectionist policies and trade disputes can be traced back to mercantilist principles. Mercantilism also left an indelible mark on theories of economic development and international relations.

Historically, mercantilism played a significant role in the rise of European powers and the shaping of the modern world. It contributed to the development of global trade networks and the spread of European culture, while also influencing the evolution of economic thought and policy-making. Although mercantilism is no longer the dominant economic theory, its principles and practices continue to resonate in today’s globalized world.

We explored the principles, impact, and legacy of mercantilism, a dominant economic theory from the 16th to the 18th century. Despite its decline due to the rise of classical economics and laissez-faire principles, mercantilism continues to influence modern economic thought and policy. This article examines the relevance of mercantilist principles in today’s world, considering the resurgence of protectionist policies, counterarguments, and the future of mercantilism in a changing global landscape.

See also  Pros and Cons of Contact Paper on Countertops

Modern Resurgence of Mercantilist Ideas and Policies

Economic Nationalism and Protectionism

In recent years, we have witnessed a resurgence of economic nationalism and protectionist policies reminiscent of mercantilist ideas. Examples of recent trade wars and disputes, such as the U.S.-China trade conflict, illustrate the enduring appeal of protectionism and economic nationalism. Governments have also intervened in their domestic industries to protect them from foreign competition, echoing the mercantilist emphasis on self-sufficiency and national interests.

State-Driven Economic Development

Mercantilism’s call for active government involvement in the economy can also be seen in modern state-driven economic development approaches. State-owned enterprises and industrial policies targeting strategic sectors reflect the belief in the state’s role in guiding economic growth and protecting national resources.

Counterarguments and Alternatives to Mercantilism

Free Trade and Globalization

Proponents of free trade and globalization argue that the benefits of comparative advantage and open markets far outweigh the protectionist measures advocated by mercantilists. Critiques of protectionism and economic nationalism highlight the potential for trade wars, inefficiencies, and reduced consumer welfare resulting from such policies.

International Cooperation and Multilateralism

In contrast to mercantilism’s focus on national interests, many modern economists and policymakers emphasize the importance of international cooperation and multilateralism. International organizations and trade agreements, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO) and regional trade blocs, promote diplomacy and conflict resolution over competition and trade disputes.

The Future of Mercantilism in a Changing World

The Role of Technology and Innovation

Technological advancements and the rise of digital trade challenge traditional mercantilist ideas, as they increase the importance of knowledge, innovation, and intangible assets over physical resources like gold and silver. The growing impact of e-commerce and digital trade also calls for updated trade policies that address new challenges and opportunities.

Environmental and Social Considerations

As the world grapples with pressing environmental and social issues, such as climate change and global inequality, the need for sustainable development and resource management becomes increasingly important. These concerns require a reevaluation of mercantilist principles that prioritize wealth accumulation and national interests over broader global goals.

Balancing National Interests and Global Cooperation

The tension between economic nationalism and international collaboration raises the question of how to reconcile these competing interests. A balanced approach to economic policy-making must consider both national interests and global cooperation, recognizing the interdependence of nations in today’s globalized world.


Acknowledging the historical significance of mercantilism is essential for understanding its enduring influence on modern economic thought and policy. While certain mercantilist principles remain relevant, such as the importance of national interests and state involvement in economic affairs, the limitations and drawbacks of protectionist policies must also be considered. In a rapidly changing world, a nuanced approach to economic policy-making that balances national interests with global cooperation is more critical than ever.







Pros and Cons of Mercantilism