Not all topics are as polarizing and anger-inducing as cloning when it comes to causing quite a stir and causing controversy. This was once considered a significant achievement in biology; however, this is no longer the case in the modern scientific industry. Its opponents are growing, making such a technological debate a hot topic in biology debates worldwide. The technology of human and plant cloning is already here. As demonstrated by Dolly, the sheep responded to the supreme God’s role in the soul, society, and even the quality of the cloned individual. In return, however, the benefits are pretty deceptive. So, would the entire program benefits society as a whole, or is it morally questionable? Here are the benefits and drawbacks of cloning humans and other animals to help you make an informed decision.
Pros of Cloning
1. Help to Eliminate Defective/Weak Genes.
Although genetic illness is not linked to being one of the killer diseases, it is a chance to develop into a severe illness in the future. As humans reproduce, cell damage in DNA structures increases, resulting in mutated and defective genes. This can be avoided by cloning new, healthy cells and replacing old, defective ones. This will improve the overall performance of the newly created cells, making them stronger and more active than the old and existing cells. The process is intended to improve the existing cell by removing or copying the entire cell structure while removing all mutated cells and defects. As a result, cloning replaces any damaged cells while also producing new and healthy cells.
2. Cloning is a Logical Step in Reproductive Technology.
Because identical twins are natural clones or polypoid in plants, we can conclude reproductive cloning is the natural, technological method of the same process. In cases where Infertility is at stake and couples cannot get their own, should not they be allowed the chance to have their own? Or the ones who have lost their kids, should they not be allowed to replace or clone their lost child? Moreover, those contributing to biology, arts, literature, and music would be ideally cloned to add a replica of the skills and add more to society. It is then a way that society can use to replace or improve skills in an existing individual. Imagine cloning the ten best football players or top musicians globally; this will increase the world’s content and improve skills that the world might lose due to death.
3. It’s an Invention that can Positively change the Globe.
Cloning humans or plants is a novel and creative method that has the potential to alter the world significantly. Not only can animals and plants be revived with this technology, but humans can also be revived to contribute some of their potential skills to the economy. The goal is to retain essential skills from specific people or features in certain animals. The untimely death of a trained and well-respected trainer can result in inefficient human labor. Cloning can fill the void and replace the position that has been left by returning the person to the people who need them the most.
4. Improve Recovery in Traumatic Injuries.
Those who developed quadriplegia due to a horrific accident or professional athletes who tore their recovery time may experience longer or even permanent damage to their body parts, making it impossible to regain their original state. Cloning the regarding can reduce recovery time and instill true healing power. The main goal of science is to provide answers, and if we can get some solutions on how to speed up the recovery of any traumatic injuries, then giving it a shot may be prudent and worthwhile.
5. Bring out New and Genetically modified Genes.
By cloning cells, potential hosts/parents will be able to select specific traits and characteristics for their children. This means choosing your offspring’s eye color, gender, and other characteristics. This is an enormous contribution and a fantastic way for many scientists to use biology in novel and beneficial ways. The world can decide to eliminate certain traits from children to improve the quality and behaviors of future generations. We can eliminate some characteristics and production rates of animals, plants, and humans through science and cloning. And cloning is a scientifically proven method of accomplishing this.
6. Eliminate Infertility.
With advancements in infertility research, the world now has some solutions and better treatments for Infertility; cloning can provide the solution and the opportunity for parents to select specific traits for their offspring. The procedure uses a cloned cell to create an identical male or female twin. This means that infertile people can feel the same pride as those with children without undergoing invasive and painful procedures to treat their reproductive organs.
7. Cures Disorders.
This technology can cure cell disorders by replacing or growing damaged organs and tissues with the plant and the human body. Transplanting any social organization becomes more straightforward, with an improved success rate. Although the possible scientific and health benefits of cloning in both animals and humans are still unknown, it is wise that such tech can fully transform better ways by which many body disorders.
Cons of Cloning
1. Faster Aging.
The entire process involves using older cells to generate a DNA structure for the clones; there is a chance that the imprinted age will be adopted in the growing and new sections. This situation may result in some premature aging complications and premature death in the worst-case scenario. A cell’s genetic sequence is thought to have produced younger cells. Because cloning is intended to replace cells, some new cells copy the same aging characteristics and print them on newly cloned animals, resulting in faster aging.
2. Cloning Interferes with Nature.
Most opponents of these approaches believe that humans created this procedure. It is intended to interfere with nature and its expanding scale; it is believed that the natural way of procreation should not be interrupted or altered. According to research on cloned humans and animals, this process affects the animals and causes many domino effect cases. Other aspects of life may be altered or negatively impacted if the process is used. And if genes are altered to produce more intelligent and bright beings than others, the average person will have no place in the development and life activities. So it is wise to allow life to be dictated by God, who first initiated it in the first place; any alteration or interference means changing the whole system from the owner.
3. Bring a Sense of Individuality.
Though animals and human clones would be an exact new set of life with distinct preferences, a slight loss of individuality would still pose a risk. These new beings will have unique thinking abilities that prevent mixing or interacting with ordinary people. There will be an increase in class and thinking group isolations due to this difference in thinking and ability to relate. Aside from cloning being a unique twin of someone regardless of age or other personal traits, the new creature introduced will have some unique traits that may distinguish it from a typical way of life. In a real-life environment, the sense of individuality is also dangerous; creatures are supposed to interact, share ideas, solve a common problem, and do other activities together. But introducing specific traits means the specific problem-solving ability and unique approaches.
4. Division of People.
One massive disadvantage to cloning animals and humans is its ability to create a gap between normal animals and cloned creatures. In cases where clones are not given equal treatment, human beings can lead to division and social unrest. And since there are existing differences and gaps in the world, from social status, race, age, and color, people might feel that animal and human cloning can impact a new difference that will harm the same.
5. Cloning may Decrease Overall Human and Animal Value of Life.
With the rise of animal and human cloning, humans and animals will inevitably become more of a random commodity than in an individual life. When parents dislike their children, they will clone other children to create a perfect child. It could also create a new societal and family division in which excellent and accurate clones are treated differently than regular people.
6. The Whole Process is Against Religious Ethics.
The whole concept of giving people another chance to choose who they want as their kids are God’s face, and having it scientifically is against any religious belief. Life is entirely God’s plan, but with cloning, it depends on science to give traits and other characteristics that are petrary to life’s owner. People or believers with a solid or basic understanding of religion oppose the whole procedure of animal and human cloning because they feel that it would lead man or scientist to be creators changing the authority of the supreme being or God. Since the whole religion has a way to introduce controversial matters, there are very passionate views that are not vital based on facts but somewhat emotional and religious beliefs. Anytime these views are based upon, religion is the sole motivating factor that keeps people agreeing or reaching concessions with this technology.
7. It has A lot of Failures.
Opponents of human and animal cloning are a moot point because the procedure is unsuccessful; on a random scale, over 89 percent of animal and human cloning attempts have failed, implying that animal DNA is only exposed to risk once during the entire process. As you can see, animal DNA can be contaminated or altered, so your chances of success are slim. Furthermore, the implication of what will happen if the entire process fails is unknown, leading to problems that science cannot solve.
The science of animal cloning has continued to improve, and it is expected that it will be long and complicated to become fully functional. Do humans and animals have a soul, which would be lost/damaged during the whole process? Or is this the following way for humanity to replace God? Reaching consciousness on this hot topic is not that simple, but having a full copy of it can lead to some clarity. Looking at both sides of the coin allows us to have a diverse viewpoint. While the discussion about cloning is ongoing, what is your take?
- Blackall LL, Burrell PC, Gwilliam H, Bradford D, Bond PL, Hugenholtz P. The use of 16S rDNA clone libraries to describe the microbial diversity of activated sludge communities. Water Science and Technology. 1998 Jan 1;37(4-5):451-4.
- LaBar M. The pros and cons of human cloning. Thought: Fordham University Quarterly. 1984 Aug 1;59(3):319-33.
- Cerf NJ, Grangier P. From quantum cloning to quantum key distribution with continuous variables: a review. JOSA B. 2007 Feb 1;24(2):324-34.